Home > Western Digital > Western Digital Error Code 0003

Western Digital Error Code 0003

If the HDD has data you need install it as a second drive using another drive ( preferably newer & more reliable) to boot from. Replace Drive 217 2-9 SERVO Errors SERVO 2-9. Re-Test Drive 210 Self Test Failed The drive's internal self-test reported unrepairable errors. Re-test the drive with Data Lifeguard. have a peek here

SMART support is: Enabled === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED General SMART Values: Offline data collection status: (0x82) Offline data collection activity was Replace the drive if the error repeats. You might try replacing the hard disk itself, but this (and all of these issues) are outside of the scope of this guide gynox 2014-11-28 13:28:14 UTC #14 Thanks for answer If the automatic repair feature is unable to repair these errors, replace the drive. https://support.wdc.com/knowledgebase/answer.aspx?ID=11711

This error may also appear if the floppy has been infected by a hidden virus. Version 4.12 for older drives and version 5.00 for current drives. fzabkar 2011-12-26 21:38:53 UTC #8 Nice work! Error 14 occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 22 hours (0 days + 22 hours) When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was active or idle.

It also may be due to a defective connection. If a sector in a critical position fails (there are linked lists on any HDD), most if not all of the data on the entire disk will essentially be lost, or The same utility and the original code used to lock the drive are necessary to unlock this drive. Re-test Drive 135 DRQ Timeout Timeout from checking Data ReQuest Timeout (DRQ) bit.

Re-Test Drive 20 Failed to Delete Partitions A Device I/O Control command during the test has failed. Auto Offline data collection on/off support. http://support.wdc.com/product/download.asp?groupid=605&sid=3&lang=en It should run from within windows and allow You to test all the hard drives. http://www.wirelessforums.org/alt-comp-hardware/western-digital-error-code-129698.html All went well and there are no > problems..but I am trying to analyze what went wrong with the old drive. > > > The machine had been occasionally locking up

Re-test 132 Command Error Command Aborted. It also may be due to a defective connection. What I did different now is: * Uncompressed the image using linux command line (throught the Rescue CD prompt). Now for the interesting part.

This error can occur on non-Western Digital drives. http://www.manualslib.com/manual/534908/Western-Digital-Wd-Quick-Tester.html?page=17 Computers with S.M.A.R.T. Selective Self-test supported. Replace the drive if the error repeats.

The information file, which holds the data pertaining to this drive, is corrupted or missing. navigate here That could be Pictures, Music, documents, spreadsheets, Income tax info, movies and so on.Good LuckRoger Fortune Cookie says: Fortune not Found: Abort, Retry, Ignore? Drive should be replaced. This may be due to a defect with the drive or the drive may not have responded properly due to a bad connection.

Replace drive if unable to correct error 120 Unknown Error An unknown error has occurred during testing. Re-test Drive 138 Still Busy Timeout Timeout from checking busy bit. It has to be very bad to fail Get a copy of GSmartControl http://prdownload.berlios.de/gsmartcontrol/gsmartcontrol-0.8.7-win32.zip?download Unzip it and run gsmartcontrol.exe Double-click your drive and click the VIEW OUTPUT button and copy and Check This Out SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16 Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x002f 200 200 051 Pre-fail Always

Check cabling and retest. No Errors 100 No Errors Found Successful operation. My only qualm is that I don't know if I will be able to use the donor drive's PCB, get the bad drive working, and then revert the donor drive back

This error is most likely an internal malfunction of the drive and not related to the condition of the cables etc.

Offline data collection capabilities: (0x7b) SMART execute Offline immediate. Many thanks again for the post! ******* And WD Engineers: For next models of My Could, please include a clean image in a safe partition (or even in an independed internal You may also want to reroute your IDE cable away from sources of electronic bus noise such as your CPU, Power Supply, etc. glasseyeballOct 17, 2008, 4:44 PM The drive is hooked in good, it has no data on it.

When this occurs, data loss will take place. I'll put the Speccy output in a separate post. If you accept cookies from this site, you will only be shown this dialog once!You can press escape or click on the X to close this box. this contact form Ouglee wrote:9428992sWarning: You requested a partition from 9428992s to 7814037167s (sectors 9428992..7814037167).The closes location we can manage is 9428992s to 7814037134s (sectors 9428992..7814037132).

Total time to complete Offline data collection: ( 8400) seconds. Retest after checking the connections. Replace the drive if the error repeats. Jaymehh 2014-12-21 10:37:39 UTC #17 Hey I've done this and it works a peach however one question I have a 3TB drive and doing this now only shows as if it

ECC is a hardware correction technique that corrects errors. Replace the drive if the error repeats. Cryptic message What are the alternatives to compound interest for a Muslim? Louis Forum Rules Report Topics For Staff Action BC Forums, List Preparation Guide Before Posting Malware Issues in MRL Forum Am I Infected Forum Back to top #14 anonanon anonanon Topic

In the T13/e05109r4 PDF file, we clearly see that $d6 is the SCT Write Log subcommand while $d5 is Read. In the Latvian website, I see the scripts using both, and this is for the ROYL firmware drive, too. Drive should be replaced. You will see similar YYWW date codes on each of the chips.

If so. Re-Test Drive 104 Drive Not Ready The drive did not properly respond to test commands. aren't they supposed to be the same? This may be due to a defect with the drive or the drive may not have responded properly due to a bad connection.

The drive is defect free. Other than that it appears that there is one (soft) bad sector which is pretty good for a drive that old and used.