Win32 Error 193 Windbg
But don't be upset, run cordll command! 0:000> .cordll -ve -u -l CLR DLL status: No load attempts That's ok that you've got nothing, to look at verbose output run any Auto publishing for specific items A crossword so simple, it practically solves itself The 10'000 year skyscraper Advisor professor asks for my dissertation research source-code My 21 yr old adult son Investigating memory issues. First, I tried the following command... .loadby sos mscorwks ...and received the response "Unable to find module 'mscorwks'". click site
Windbg 32 Bit
Thanks in advance Reply Alejandro Campos Magencio says: November 2, 2010 at 2:04 am Hi H debugs, If you want to debug a 32bit app in user mode, it is better After actions above!threads now gives you an output, but ...kind of encrypted in addresses: Index TID TEB StackBase StackLimit DeAlloc StackSize ThreadProc 0 0000000000000000 0x00000000fffdb000 0x0000000000000000 0x000000000022fd20 0x0000000000000000 0xffffffffffdd02e0 0xffffffff80004002 Looks We are doing business.
Reply H Debugs says: November 3, 2010 at 8:02 am I am using Windbg like you 🙂 I want to explore some kernel structures for example, just for interest. I'm going to install an old 32bit version of WinDbg, but don't know what to expect. –Dave Dec 21 '10 at 7:51 5 @Dave: Maybe too little too late, but Browse other questions tagged windbg or ask your own question. The Call To Loadlibrary(sos) Failed, Win32 Error 0n2 more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed
What should I do now? Sos Does Not Support The Current Target Architecture. Debugging Tools For Windows (x64) is installed in both VMs. So we try to open dmp file in WinDbg (x86) : 0:000> .loadby sos clr0:000> !threadsSOS does not support the current target architecture.0:000> .load wow64exts0:000> !wow64exts.swSwitched to Guest (WoW) mode0:000:x86> !threadsSOS http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4373683/unable-to-load-sos-in-windbg If you do not have the possibility to ask for the dlls, you'll have to find this dlls on the internet, but this is not that easy.
Check these links: Debugging WOW64 A look at the WoW64 layer in the debugger I hope this helps. Unable To Find Module 'clr' Template images by Barcin. Failed to load data access DLL, 0x80004005 Verify that 1) you have a recent build of the debugger (6.2.14 or newer) etc.etc. So we try to force load of x64 SOS: 0:000> .cordll -u -ve -I clr -lp c:\windows\microsoft.net\framework64\v4.0.30319Automatically loaded SOS ExtensionCLRDLL: Loaded DLL c:\windows\microsoft.net\framework64\v4.0.30319\mscordacwks.dllCLR DLL status: Loaded DLL c:\windows\microsoft.net\framework64\v4.0.30319\mscordacwks.dll However we can’t
Sos Does Not Support The Current Target Architecture.
share|improve this answer answered Mar 17 '14 at 17:39 Brian Rasmussen 85.5k25165263 add a comment| up vote 1 down vote By default, the installer seems to put both 32-bit and 64-bit http://hintslibrary.blogspot.com/2013/11/windbg-call-to-loadlibrary-failed-win32.html What version are you using? Windbg 32 Bit Look in for an "x86" directory in the directory where WinDbg installed, and run the version of windbg.exe contained there. %1 Is Not A Valid Win32 Application Windbg And one more issue.
share|improve this answer answered Mar 11 '11 at 1:37 nithins 2,508717 I think you're right @nithins, the problem is probably w3wp.exe running under WoW64 (I see wow64 using ~kb). get redirected here Why was Susan treated so unkindly? =TEXT([Date Column],"MMMM") issue aligning shapes in latex What are the alternatives to compound interest for a Muslim? The thing is SOS does not support cross-platform debugging. Windbg : Display parameters whenever specific func... ► 2011 (6) ► November (1) ► October (1) ► September (2) ► August (1) ► January (1) ► 2010 (9) ► October (2) Windbg Sos Commands
These are the commands I use to change the context to the process I want to debug in kernel mode, not sure if that helps: .process 8987e5d0 -> Changes process This will have to do. What is the parentage of Gil-galad? navigate to this website Let's try to see 32bit stuff only:0:000> .load wow64exts 0:000> !sw Switched to 32bit mode Let's check the unmanaged call stack:0:000:x86> kL ChildEBP RetAddr 002df57c 79f55b05 kernel32!RaiseException+0x53 002df5dc 7a0904d5 mscorwks!RaiseTheExceptionInternalOnly+0x226 002df6a0
In this concrete casecustomer should take mscordacwks from"Framework" folder (as we need x86), from v.2.0.50727 folder - this all can be found from our error messages. Win32 Error 0n87 The Parameter Is Incorrect Thanks ia. After many Internet searches and things tried I'm stumped.
asked 5 years ago viewed 5876 times active 5 years ago Blog Stack Overflow Podcast #93 - A Very Spolsky Halloween Special Related 111Unable to load SOS in WinDbg1windbg - module
Since theCLR is loaded from 32bit .NET Framework, SOS.dll will be loaded from 32bit Framework which is why the error message said LoadLibrary(..\Framework\sos). Perfcounters. ► May (2) ► April (4) ► March (3) About Me Kate Butenko View my complete profile Picture Window template. Why cast an A-lister for Groot? http://3cq.org/win32-error/windbg-unable-to-load-image-win32-error-0n2.php Mscordacwks.dll is different too, of course.
My setup is VM-to-VM over serial connection and both VMs are Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1. Email check failed, please try again Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. %d bloggers like this: Debug and Beyond A developer's notes - Debugging Thursday, January 26, 2012 Windbg: I am beginner in windbg and read even the manual but I couldn't find a solution. Dealing with a nasty recruiter Why is this C++ code faster than assembly Interlace strings What is Wilson's theorem?
So these versions must match. What if we try removing the SOS architecture check, will it explode? Then we should tell our debugger to find symbols in this folder, if you haven't done it yet, and try to load everything again: .symfix c:\symbols 0:000> .loadby sos mscorwks 0:000> And since we're running the 64-bit version of WinDbg and we try to load a 32-bit SOS, we will need to start a compatible version of WinDbg instead.
Why does typography ruin the user experience? Sum other numbers Which is the most acceptable numeral for 1980 to 1989?